Technical Note

Static vs. Kinetic SPR: P4SPR 2.0 and P4PRO Compared

2023

← Back to Resources
Systems: P4SPR 2.0 (static), P4PRO (kinetic) Analyte: Human IgG (Hm IgG) Ligand: Mouse anti-human IgG (MAH IgG) Surface: MHDA covalent capture
Download PDF

Introduction

Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) instruments provide a wealth of information — kinetics, affinity, and concentration — depending on how the experiment is configured. Two fundamentally different setups enable SPR analysis: static and kinetic.

In a static system, the sample solution is introduced manually by syringe into the flow cell and interacts with the surface through diffusion. In a kinetic system, a sample loop is loaded (by manual syringe or autosampler), and the sample is introduced into the flow cell by flowing running buffer through the loop via a syringe pump.

This technical note compares features and describes how both modes can characterize biomolecular interactions. Two very similar polyclonal mouse anti-human IgG (MAH IgG) capture surfaces were created and characterized with binding of whole human IgG (Hm IgG).

Binding kinetics — key parameters

Using a basic Langmuir 1:1 binding model where an immobilized ligand (L) interacts with an analyte (A):

A + L ⇌ AL

The rate constants kon and koff represent the association and dissociation reactions respectively. The dissociation equilibrium constant KD — expressed in molarity (M) — represents the concentration at which half of the immobilized ligands are bound:

KD = [A][L] / [AL] = koff / kon

Static vs. Kinetic: What Each Mode Provides

Static SPR — P4SPR 2.0

Well-suited for screening and quantification. Provides a snapshot of binding at steady state, allowing rapid analysis of large sample sets. Assay times can be up to half that of kinetic SPR, owing to simplified sample introduction, faster baseline establishment, and efficient flushing. Ideal for specificity screening, analyte quantification, and affinity characterization (KD).

Kinetic SPR — P4PRO

Provides a complete picture of molecular interaction dynamics — including association rate (kon), dissociation rate (koff), affinity (KD), and maximum binding response (Rmax). By monitoring both association and dissociation phases in real time, kinetic SPR enables mechanistic interpretation of binding strength and drug residence time.

Comparison table of static vs kinetic SPR capabilities — live binding data, specificity screening, concentration analysis, KD, kon/koff, simultaneous 4-channel, single and multi-cycle
Table 1. Comparison of capabilities between static and kinetic SPR modes.

Instrumentation

Both Affinité instruments introduce sample through manual syringe injection. In the static P4SPR 2.0, the sample is introduced directly from the syringe inlet into the flow cell (Figure 1). In the P4PRO kinetic system, the sample is injected into a sample loop and flowed through the flow cell by the integrated Affipump (Figure 2).

P4SPR 2.0 diagram showing direct syringe inlet to sensor to waste flow path
Figure 1. P4SPR 2.0 — static injection mode.
P4PRO diagram showing Affipump, sample loop, sensor and waste in kinetic flow path
Figure 2. P4PRO — kinetic flow-injection mode with Affipump.

Assay Design

Two analogous assays were run under the same conditions in static and kinetic systems. Affinité Instruments MHDA sensors were activated with a 1:1 (v/v) mixture of 30 mM EDC and 100 mM NHS for 4 minutes. Mouse anti-human IgG capture reagent was prepared at 5 µg/mL in 10 mM sodium acetate (pH 4.5) and injected manually for 30 seconds in sample channels. Surfaces were then deactivated with a 6-minute injection of 1M ethanolamine (pH 8.0).

Similar ligand densities of MAH IgG were immobilized across both surfaces (114 RU and 61 RU). Human IgG concentrations ranging from 0.89–72 nM (three-fold serial dilution) were prepared in PBS 1x + 0.1% Tween-20 (pH 7.4). Samples were injected for 600 s in the P4SPR 2.0 at ~100 µL/s, and for 150 s in the P4PRO at 50 µL/min. Surfaces were regenerated between injections with 10 mM glycine–HCl (pH 2.0).

Schematic of binding molecular events: human IgG analyte binding to immobilized mouse anti-human IgG on MHDA SAM surface
Figure 3. Scheme of binding molecular events. Human IgG analyte (teal) binds to immobilized MAH IgG antibody (blue) on the MHDA SAM sensor surface.

Results

Static SPR — P4SPR 2.0

In static SPR, only the association phase is observable. The signal gradually increases as analyte binds to the immobilized ligand. Once most available sites are occupied, the signal reaches a plateau — the steady state — where association and dissociation are in equilibrium. The shape and kinetics of the rising curve provide qualitative information on binding affinity, association rate, and stoichiometry.

Static SPR sensorgram overlay: human IgG at 0.89, 2.7, 8.0, 24, 72 nM binding to immobilized MAH IgG, reference-subtracted
Figure 4. Static SPR sensorgram overlay — Hm IgG at 0, 0.89, 2.7, 8.0, 24, and 72 nM binding to immobilized MAH IgG. Reference channel subtracted.

SPR shift values at steady state were plotted as a function of concentration and fitted using Affinité's ezControl software (Figure 5). From the curve fit, Rmax was evaluated at 63 RU and KD at 4.9 nM.

Static KD evaluation: SPR shift versus IgG concentration showing sigmoidal binding curve, KD marked at 4.9 nM, Rmax 63 RU
Figure 5. Static KD evaluation in ezControl software. Binding curve fit: Rmax = 63 RU, KD = 4.9 nM.

Kinetic SPR — P4PRO

In kinetic SPR, both association and dissociation phases are observable. During the association phase, analyte binds to the surface and the SPR signal rises. The rate of increase reflects kon. Once analyte injection ends, buffer displaces the analyte and the signal decreases — the rate of decrease reflects koff.

A relatively steep association slope indicates fast binding; a flat, slow dissociation slope — as seen here — indicates strong, long-lived antibody binding.

Kinetic SPR sensorgram overlay: human IgG at 0.89, 2.7, 8.0, 24, 72 nM showing association and dissociation phases, reference and blank subtracted
Figure 6. Kinetic SPR sensorgram overlay — Hm IgG at 0, 0.89, 2.7, 8.0, 24, and 72 nM. Red dashed line marks start of dissociation phase. Reference channel and blank subtracted.

TraceDrawer global fitting of the kinetic data (Figure 7) yields full rate constants. The steep on-rate and slow off-rate confirm strong antibody binding with sub-nanomolar affinity.

Kinetic SPR data with TraceDrawer global fit: Bmax=83.35 RU, ka=3.42e5, kd=3.10e-4, KD=0.91 nM
Figure 7. Kinetic data with TraceDrawer global fit. Light traces: raw data. Bold traces: fitted curves. Fit parameters shown inset.

Comparison of Results

Comparison table: static KD=5 nM, kinetic KD=1 nM, kon=3.42e5, koff=3.10e-4, Rmax static 63 vs kinetic 83 RU
Table 2. Kinetic and affinity parameters from static SPR (P4SPR 2.0) and kinetic SPR (P4PRO).

In kinetic SPR, the interaction yielded kon = 3.42 × 105 M−1s−1, koff = 3.10 × 10−4 s−1, KD = 1 nM, and Rmax = 83 RU. In static SPR, kon and koff are not individually observable; Rmax was evaluated at 63 RU and KD at 5 nM.

The modest difference in KD (5 nM static vs. 1 nM kinetic) reflects the static system's limitation: with a 600 s injection, lower-concentration curves do not fully reach true steady state. A longer analyte on-time would project a higher Rmax and a lower KD, bringing the static result closer to the kinetic measurement.

Key result: Both P4SPR 2.0 and P4PRO resolve KD in the low nM range. Static mode delivers affinity in under one hour — no pump required. Kinetic mode adds full rate constants (kon, koff) for mechanistic interpretation of binding dynamics.

Summary

Static and kinetic SPR are complementary tools, not competing ones. The choice depends on what information is needed:

Used together, static screening narrows down candidates quickly while kinetic analysis characterizes the most promising interactions in detail.

Not sure which instrument fits your workflow?

Talk to us — we'll help you pick the right mode for your application.

Request a Demo Compare Instruments →